The Avacado Has Eaten Your Spleen
Actually, it didn't. I just felt like tricking you into the illusion a vegetable had eaten a body part of yours. I mean, geez, why would I do that?
Anyway- I've recently finished up the book Harrp Potter: The Half-Blood Prince. It was a very good addition to an already spectacular series, and a couple of interesting theories were brought to light for me thanks to the Baten Kaitos Forums (linked to to the right), and the Harry Potter Lexicon (http://www.hp-lexicon.org/index-2.html). And, without further ado, here they are:
WARNING: In the following paragraphs are minor to major spoilers*. If you have not yet finished this *SUPERB* novel and read the following, your head will explode and a litter of puppies will jump out of the debris caused by it. (Actually, no puppies will appear nor will your head explode, no matter how much it disappoints me so.) On to the theories.
Most people are wondering why Dumbledore trusted Snape. Perhaps to the suspicions of Snape's history as a Death Eater and the oddity of his employment to a school like Hogwarts. So Snape might've took an Unbreakable Vow with Dumbledore stating that he would never betray Dumbledore, with Aberforth probably being the Bonder. However- when Snape Vowed to Narcissa that he would assist her son in killing Dumbledore, that he would die too by breaking his Vow with Dumbledore and betraying him.
Snape probably then rushed to Dumbledore, and told him of his predicament. Dumbledore then decided that Snape staying alive would be more important than he, himself surviving, so he ordered Snape to assist Draco in killing him. That way, if Snape did not kill Dumbledore, he would disobey Dumbledore, therefore betraying him. (He would also break his Vow with Narcissa.)
When Hagrid said he heard Snape and Dumbledore arguing, Snape might have been having second thoughts. So when Dumbledore said "you have to do it," he was talking of Snape killing him. Then, when Harry heard Dumbledore saying "Severus, please" as if he was pleading, he was actually telling Snape to kill him, or both of them would die. (If Snape did not kill him, he would be killed by breaking his Vow with Dumbledore. Then the Death Eaters would just kill Dumbledore.) So Snape would actually be good!
And don't forget R.A.B.- the mysterious man who stole the Horcrux in the cave. Theories speculate that this is Regulus Black, before he died, of course. (Regulus was a Death Eater, that much of which I'm sure. He did die, right?) We'll just have to wait 'til the 7th book to find out if these things are true, now won't we?
END SPOILERS/THEORIES
And now I take my leave of you, and my multiple sentences in parentheses and capital letters would have been enough punishment for you guys. Fare thee well- so I can hurt you when you return.
Anyway- I've recently finished up the book Harrp Potter: The Half-Blood Prince. It was a very good addition to an already spectacular series, and a couple of interesting theories were brought to light for me thanks to the Baten Kaitos Forums (linked to to the right), and the Harry Potter Lexicon (http://www.hp-lexicon.org/index-2.html). And, without further ado, here they are:
WARNING: In the following paragraphs are minor to major spoilers*. If you have not yet finished this *SUPERB* novel and read the following, your head will explode and a litter of puppies will jump out of the debris caused by it. (Actually, no puppies will appear nor will your head explode, no matter how much it disappoints me so.) On to the theories.
Most people are wondering why Dumbledore trusted Snape. Perhaps to the suspicions of Snape's history as a Death Eater and the oddity of his employment to a school like Hogwarts. So Snape might've took an Unbreakable Vow with Dumbledore stating that he would never betray Dumbledore, with Aberforth probably being the Bonder. However- when Snape Vowed to Narcissa that he would assist her son in killing Dumbledore, that he would die too by breaking his Vow with Dumbledore and betraying him.
Snape probably then rushed to Dumbledore, and told him of his predicament. Dumbledore then decided that Snape staying alive would be more important than he, himself surviving, so he ordered Snape to assist Draco in killing him. That way, if Snape did not kill Dumbledore, he would disobey Dumbledore, therefore betraying him. (He would also break his Vow with Narcissa.)
When Hagrid said he heard Snape and Dumbledore arguing, Snape might have been having second thoughts. So when Dumbledore said "you have to do it," he was talking of Snape killing him. Then, when Harry heard Dumbledore saying "Severus, please" as if he was pleading, he was actually telling Snape to kill him, or both of them would die. (If Snape did not kill him, he would be killed by breaking his Vow with Dumbledore. Then the Death Eaters would just kill Dumbledore.) So Snape would actually be good!
And don't forget R.A.B.- the mysterious man who stole the Horcrux in the cave. Theories speculate that this is Regulus Black, before he died, of course. (Regulus was a Death Eater, that much of which I'm sure. He did die, right?) We'll just have to wait 'til the 7th book to find out if these things are true, now won't we?
END SPOILERS/THEORIES
And now I take my leave of you, and my multiple sentences in parentheses and capital letters would have been enough punishment for you guys. Fare thee well- so I can hurt you when you return.
posted by Shino @ 10:38 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home